[295.2] TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT NORMAN

Briefing on media accusations against Christian Peacemaker Teams (Ekklesia, UK, 27/03/06).

Since Christian peace activist Norman Kember returned to Britain on 23 March 2006, following four months of captivity in Iraq, numerous media outlets have printed hostile, inaccurate, poorly researched and sometimes vitriolic accusations against him and his colleagues. Ekklesia, the respected UK religious think tank, which has also developed a fruitful exchange relationship with Christian Peacemaker Teams in the UK, has been covering the story of the hostages and their release in detail since its inception.

We have produced well over a hundred news stories and several briefings, as well as commenting to the media in the UK and internationally. What follows is a rehearsal of the most common allegations followed by straightforward responses to them. The intention is not to go into detail (that is available elsewhere on http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/) or to speak on behalf of CPT, but to clarify from Ekklesia’s perspective those major misconceptions which are in danger of being received as ‘facts’ in some quarters. The concern is to seek the truth of the situation and present information which, in spite of being made available to media sources, is still overlooked. FULL BRIEFING HERE.

Your help in making this briefing available and circulating it widely to friends, contacts, media outlets and organisations you are in touch with would be gratefully appreciated. (Simon Barrow & Jonathan Bartley)

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[12.22 GMT] Getting into harm's way: Critics say group should stay out of war zone, but CPT insists it belongs in Baghdad. By Leslie Scrivener (Toronto Star, Canada); How grateful was Norman Kember supposed to be? By Jenny Kleeman (Guardian, UK). There's acres of tosh about CPT in today's UK Sunday papers. Right-wing groups in the US have also been phoning the CPT offices to abuse them - to be met with calm consideration. Well done, Scott. And the National Review has been spamming people with hateful propaganda against them. Amidst this flood of vitriol, its worth focussing on two pieces of much gretaer merit, especially the TS one.

[295.1] JIM LONEY: HOPE IN CAPTIVITY

It was a terrifying, profound, powerful, transformative and excruciatingly boring experience. Since my release, my rescue from captivity, I have been in a constant state of wonder, bewilderment, surprise, as I slowly discover the magnitude of the efforts to secure our lives and freedom: Tom Fox, Norman Kember, Harmeet Singh Sooden and myself. A great of hand of solidarity reached out for us; a hand that included the hands of Palestinian children holding pictures of us and the hands of the British soldier who cut our chains with a bolt cutter. That great hand was able to deliver the three of us from the shadow of death. I am grateful in a way that can never be adequately expressed in words. There are so many people that need this hand of solidarity, right now, today, and I’m thinking specifically of prisoners being held all over the world. People who have disappeared into an abyss of detention without charges, due process, hope for release, some victims of physical and psychological torture, people unknown and forgotten. It is my deepest wish that every forsaken human being should have a hand of solidarity reaching out to them. My friend and fellow Canadian in captivity, Harmeet Sooden, showed me something yesterday. Our captors gave us notebooks and Harmeet opened his notebook to show me two fractions, three quarters and four quarters, that Tom had written. It was the only thing he wrote in my book, he said. Tom, who had been a professional musician, wrote them as part of a lesson he was giving Harmeet in music theory - three quarter time, four quarter time. Harmeet put his finger over the three quarters and said, in the beginning, we were four quarters. Then he put his finger over the four quarters and said now we are only three quarters. Tom is not coming home with us. I am so sorry that’s the ending. Full statement here.

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[294.1] WEILDING OUT THE ANTI-PEACE BIG GUNS

The Revd Canon Dr Alan Billings, a former member of the Archbishop’s Commission on Urban Priority Areas (which produced the famous 1985 Faith in the City report), launched an extraordinarily personal and vitriolic attack on Christian Peacemaker Teams on the BBC Radio 4 Sunday Programme this morning. The UK Sunday newspapers are also full of accusations of ‘ingratitude’ and ‘irresponsibility’. Others – like former hostage Terry Waite (the Archbishop of Canterbury’s envoy, who was himself a captive in Lebanon in the 1980s) and Canon Andrew White (an Anglican vicar and diplomat who has worked for reconciliation but also backed the Gulf wars) – have been wielded out by the media to have a go at CPT too, though usually in rather more moderate terms. Attempts have also been made over the past 24-hours to get leading Muslim spokespeople to join the condemnation.

By contrast, little if anything has been said about the legitimate peace tradition within mainstream Christianity, and many of those being encouraged to condemn CPT appear to know little or nothing of its operations. Dr Billings (who has been a vocal supporter of Tony Blair's war in Iraq) betrayed his ignorance by characterising Christian peacemakers (who he called ‘un-Christian’) as people who parachute in and out of situations of conflict. Nothing could be further from the truth. CPT was in Iraq before the invasion, and prepares, locates and supports its workers with care.

It is extremely sad that people should be so readily co-opted to a press-stoked furore with little attempt to look at the facts or to engage in thoughtful debate. But it is not surprising. By seeking to use non-violent methods and by being prepared to operate without the usual military safeguards (a point which their critics keep overlooking in their rush to say that they ‘endangered the lives of troops’), CPT and similar organisations are calling into question the whole basis of militarism as a policy strategy, and the collusion of much mainstream Christianity in an order which not only perpetuates violence but remains blind to other ways of being (what I'd call 'alternate realisms').

There will be more on this on Ekklesia later today. Hopefully, rather than simply joining a bitter verbal exchange, those who believe that strategic non-violence can play an important and considered role in situations of conflict will over the coming weeks and months seek to join Dr Billings and those like him to a more considered conversation about options and ethics. But we should not be naive to the fact that some who oppose peace-making have little interest in thoughtful discussion, and every motive for waging and ideological battle.

The other issues that need examination are the rush in public life to deny us moral choices (in this case the refusal of violence) and the curious subordination of facts to engineered values in news reporting - something I have commented on in terms of the 'script' of this story in Contending the logic of violence.

See also: Kember receives ire of newspapers (BBC News, UK); The return of Norman Kember: A bitter homecoming (Independent, UK).

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[293.3] THE STORY YOU DIDN'T GET ELSEWHERE

One of the key roles of Christian Peacemaker Teams in Iraq has been to help bridge the divide between Sunnis and Shias, to expose prisoner abuses, to work for non-violent solutions to conflict, to stand up for human rights – and in effect, say observers, to restore the reputation of Christianity in the face its cooption for aggressive purposes by the US religious right.

CPT was operating as a recognised NGO in Iraq sometime before the US invasion in 2003. They were also exposing abuse against Iraqis four months before the Abu Ghraib scandal emerged. The group has been public in its willingness to act without military protection, both in pursuit of pacifist principles and also to avoid causing risk or harm to others.

However these points have been largely overlooked in the light of the media-stoked ‘row’ over the wrongful allegations of ingratitude. A key figure in this appears to be General Sir Mike Jackson, described by The Times as the UK’s top army chief. Questioning the role of CPT in Iraq, General Jackson told Channel 4 News and ITN yesterday that he was “saddened” that Norman Kember appeared not to have thanked the soldiers who freed him. These allegations came a full day after Christian Peacemaker Teams had in fact published a public thank-you statement on its website, www.cpt.org.

A media commentator told Ekklesia today that it “would have been extraordinary” if the army had not known this. General Jackson’s unverified accusation was then interpreted by many news sources as a factual statement – particularly through outlets known to have a strong relationship to the military and the intelligence services.

It is believed that the armed services are keen to use the freeing of the Christian peace activists as a means of bolstering their reputation following continued public and political concern about the invasion, occupation and ongoing military presence in Iraq. The successes of non-violent assistance workers in collaborating effectively with communities otherwise divided by ideology, the insurgency and the Western armed presence is also believed to have caused annoyance to military chiefs.

Those close to the situation on the ground say that there is much more to emerge about the circumstances of the freeing of Kember, Loney and Sooden. Questions are already being raised about the true extent to which the military were responsible. More will emerge in the next few days.

But none of this contention has detracted from the joy and gratitude of the many thousands of people – Christian, Muslim, those of many faiths and simply good faith – who have worked for the release of Dr Kember and his colleagues. More.

Further army intrigue: Colonel Bob Stewart repeated the allegation that CPT had not expressed gratitude, on Channel 4 News tonight. CPT UK spokesperson David Cockburn pointed out that this wasn't true. I am in touch with the Ministry of Defence to find out what is going wrong with their basic intelligence capacities. C4 presenter Krishnan Guru Murthy also said that Dr Kember was "refusing" to talk about his rescue. In fact he indicated that he needed some respite before making further comment.

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[293.2] CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKER RETURNS - QUESTIONS REMAIN

Norman Kember returns home to cheers and also smears (Ekklesia, UK); Freed Iraq hostage Kember back in Britain and Kember thanks military rescuers (Reuters, UK); Freed Kember thanks rescuers (BBC News, UK, inc video clip). The Rev Bob Gardiner, of Harrow Baptist Church, said: "We are grateful to the British government for its close co-operation with myself and the Kember family since Norman was kidnapped in November. We were impressed by the sensitivity with which it responded to our concerns about any possible use of force in any rescue attempt. We are thankful for the way in which they honoured their promises to intervene only when there was a considerable degree of assurance that there would be no loss of life. We are also grateful for the compassionate way in which Pat Kember in particular was guided and protected, encouraged and kept up to date during the period of Norman's captivity and the kindness shown by those in direct contact with her."

[Also on Ekklesia: Think tank questions 'ungrateful peacemakers' media allegations (24/03/06); Press briefing on released Christian Peacemakers (23/03/06); news updates on FaithInSociety; Contending the logic of violence (24/03/06) - Simon Barrow says that true Christian peacemaking cannot afford naivete; Churches urged to consider more radical peacemaking following Iraq hostage release (24/03/06); Questions asked about intelligence that preceded Christian peacemaker's release (24/03/06); Nonviolent release for Christian peacemakers (23/03/06); Press briefing on released Christian Peacemakers (23/03/06); Christians defend Iraq nonviolence tactics against critics (23/03/06); Christians urge love of enemies in face of hostage crisis (23/03/06); Joy as Christian Peacemakers are freed in Iraq (23/03/06). Exploring Christianity and violence - meeting in London on 30 March 2006]

[293.1] A CAMPAIGN OF SPIN AGAINST NORMAN KEMBER?

Peace activist Dr Norman Kember has been re-united with his family and friends today. But questions remain about the origins of the barrage of hostile publicity he has received - based on the mistaken and (by now) oft-refuted premise that he showed no gratitude to the soldiers who had freed him. In fact CPT issued a thank-you statement the day he was released, a local security official reported Kember as thanking his rescuers, his wife issued a thank-you statement too, and those close to both the former captives and Christian Peacemaker Teams also made the truth of the situation clear. Now Kember has confirmed it as his first public act on arrival in Britain.

Ekklesia has asked The Sun (Norman Snubs SAS heroes) and The Times (Army's top general attacks Kember for failing to thank SAS rescue team) to correct their blatantly misleading stories. The Daily Telegraph at least amended theirs by quoting Jonathan Bartley and the CPT statement at the end ('No note of gratitude' from freed hostage), though they did not alter the headline or the substantial tenor of their report - and apparently did not check the facts themselves. They were only willing to say that it was "claimed" that CPT had expressed thanks. It would have taken seconds to confirm.

Top marks to the BBC and Reuters for unravelling the story pretty quickly, however - with interviews featuring Bartley, Bruce Kent (who rightly expressed amazement that poor Norman was being expected to produce definitive statements immediately after his terrible ordeal) and Tim Nafziger of CPT UK (Kember due back in Britain). The Mirror creditably posed the supposed 'story' as a question (Did Kember refuse to thank SAS rescuers?), though PA was slightly slower to catch on ('No thank-you' storm as Kember flies home) - but has now done so, at least in its later paragraphs.

There are two major points of note here. First, the full story about how the captives came to be freed unharmed has not yet been told - and the army and intelligence services may turn out to be significantly less central to it than they and everyone else seems to assume at the moment. Second, the 'Kember ungrateful' line has come from military sources - particularly General Sir Michael Jackson ("the army's top chief"), who toured the studios yesterday (notably ITN and C4) peddling a notion which, by his own words, it is clear he had not checked. Jackson's "sadness" at a hypothetical situation he could not verify came out of the mouth of a skilled media operative. In fact the CPT statement of gratitude was made public the day before. To suppose the army did not know this would be naive, sadly.

On the contrary, the military have been keen to talk up their actual or alleged role in the saga, to sideline or ignore the fact that Kember and the other CPT activists had unambiguously asked that others should not risk their lives or those of others for them (Kember's family 'were reassured over rescue attempt', Ireland Online) , and to spin those outlets with whom they enjoy a cosy relationship - such as The Times, The Telegraph and The Sun's defence correspondent. Ukur.net has a highly acerbic comment on all this, which is overblown but not unjustified in the circumstances.

More of the truth will emerge over the next few days. Let's hope that by the time the facts come into focus the general media will not already have decided to "move on". See also: Freed Iraq hostage Kember lands back in Britain (ABC News, USA).

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[291.2] MISREPRESENTING CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKER TEAMS

Think tank questions 'ungrateful peacemakers' media allegations (Ekklesia, UK) - "The UK religious think tank Ekklesia has responded to continuing media criticism of Christian Peacemaker Teams for alleged ingratitude towards those who freed Norman Kember and two Canadian colleagues yesterday, and for the supposed irresponsibility of its actions in Iraq. Speaking to Channel 4 News in the UK, Ekklesia director Jonathan Bartley explained why accusations that the CPT hostages had exposed their rescuers to danger were inaccurate. The organisation’s workers in Iraq had explicitly told thee authorities that in the event of capture they did not wish to be freed by military action, he said." Continued here, with attention to CPT strategy, its long-term commitment in Iraq, human rights, Abu Ghraib, and the bringing together of Sunnis and Shias in a Muslim Peacemakers Team. See also: Contending the logic of violence (Simon Barrow).

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[291.1] WHY ARE THOSE CHRISTIAN PEACEMAKERS SO UNGRATEFUL?

I have probably received more angry and irate letters about this than any other public issue since my association with Ekklesia. Amidst the joy about their release, there is genuine outrage and bewilderment at CPT's initial response to the freeing of Norman, Harmeet and Jim - based on the way it has been represented in the media. While the much of the press is going into SAS-mode, Christian Peacemaker Teams have continued to call for the withdrawal of coalition troops from Iraq and to stress that, while delighted that their friends are alive, they at no point asked for military intervention. It is not difficult to see how this can be presented as graceless and ungrateful - perhaps even a denial of the realities on the ground. But that misunderstands the meaning and motive behind what's being said - and not said. An addendum (see below) was rapidly added to the CPT site to make public the gratitude that the captives had expressed personally. On the other hand, there are many commentators who are itching for a "confession" that "nonviolence doesn't work" and that "our boys" have the answer after all. And they show no concern for the immense pressure the hostages have just been under.

There is a seductive and reductive politics behind the personal animosity towards a group of people who (in Doug Pritchard's words) decided to work for justice, peace and human rights without asking for armed guards or security privileges. The US and UK authorities clearly hope to use this story to shore up support for their much-criticised Iraq policy. Of course there are necessary questions about the propriety of this. Just as there are necessary things to be said about the good done by soldiers in what, thankfully, turned out to be an intervention without killing. But such things cannot be usefully said in a climate of accusation and bitterness. Meanwhile, we should not lose sight of the thousands of Iraqis held hostage or detained. What are we doing to help them?

I have tried to respond to the criticisms of CPT in an open and honest way in my article, Contending the logic of violence (Ekklesia, UK). You can read the whole piece and decide whether what I have said is fair and true. Here is an excerpt:

Nonviolence is not an easy or soft option. On the contrary, it requires redirecting, retraining and refocusing some our most primitive and natural energies – rather than simplifying problems by imposing our will or eliminating (quite literally) the human obstacle.

Peace is not primarily a policy, it is a culture, a community and a set of countervailing practices which require both courage and calculation. It is the wisdom of the dove contending with, but not easily displacing, the wisdom of the serpent.

In other words, not-killing does not come naturally. It needs to be learned.

Peacemaking, as distinct from peace-wishing or peace-talking, will often be dismissed as ‘do-gooding’. That was a phrase I heard on the radio to describe Norman Kember... Yet, to use a phrase beloved of military advocates, what is the alternative to doing good? Doing bad, perhaps, or doing nothing? That we can mock serious attempts to inject non-violence into situations of intractable conflict, even at some risk, shows how hopelessly anaesthetised we are by the hatreds that form us.

Christian Peacemaker Teams operate with care and consideration. They train, prepare and support people with a dedication that far exceeds the easy condemnations of their critics. Such dedication is little-known and often much-misunderstood in civilian circles – that is, by people who have known neither the true horror of war nor the true price of shalom/salaam.

There is indeed an irony to peacemakers being rescued by soldiers. And it would be both churlish and wrong to deny the good offices of those who bear arms, even as we seek to outlaw their instruments of death.

But in a world where toxic religion is fuelling both heartless jihad and gung-ho militarism it would surely be a far greater irony to deny the witness of those whose chief role is to demonstrate that human beings do not have to live in the enmity of might-is-right.

For what lies at the heart of Christian peacemaking is neither suffocating piety, nor the invocation of the divine as a magic potion, nor a sense of moral superiority over those caught up in life’s death-dealing. It is, rather, the conviction that a bond of a love which is willing to embrace suffering in hope is finally stronger than all the weapons of destruction ever assembled.

This unlikely possibility is embodied in a ‘script’, the Gospel of Jesus, which is not about quick victory or the triumph of empire. Rather, it is about a small, vulnerable community forged from the wounds of a Galilean peasant – a man crucified between the certainties of politics-as-usual and religion-as-usual.

It is in this event that, extraordinary though it may seem, the boundless love of God is to be seen: a love which delivers us from evil not by twisting events to its own ends, but by reshaping the very people who have to negotiate those events.

More on the future of Christian peacemaking at SojoNet. There is also a heartfelt and beautifully expressed response on the "ingratitude" issue here on FreeTheCaptivesNow.

CPT released this statement last night - "We have been so overwhelmed and overjoyed to have Jim, Harmeet and Norman freed, that we have not adequately thanked the people involved with freeing them, nor remembered those still in captivity. So we offer these paragraphs as the first of several addenda: We are grateful to the soldiers who risked their lives to free Jim, Norman and Harmeet. As peacemakers who hold firm to our commitment to nonviolence, we are also deeply grateful that they fired no shots to free our colleagues. We are thankful to all the people who gave of themselves sacrificially to free Jim, Norman, Harmeet and Tom over the last four months, and those supporters who prayed and wept for our brothers in captivity, for their loved ones and for us, their co-workers. We will continue to lift Jill Carroll up in our prayers for her safe return. In addition, we will continue to advocate for the human rights of Iraqi detainees and assert their right to due process in a just legal system."

Comment on this post: FaithInSociety

[11.15 GMT] Churches urged to consider more radical peacemaking following Iraq hostage release (Ekklesia, UK). Kember prepares to return to Britain (Guardian Unlimited, UK); Norman Kember: 'It's great to be free' (ITV.com, UK); Praise for Kember's rescue team (BBC News, UK).

[09.15 GMT] Gene Stoltzfus, the founder of Christian Peacemaker Teams, has written a column called Blessed are the peacemakers (Ekklesia, UK) which argues that churches need to look at more radical options in this area. I'm honoured that he quotes my press statement from yesterday. Gene goes on to say: Can we work to answer the question, how should Christian peacemakers place themselves into difficult situations where terrorism is rampant? Is there a more disciplined way in which peacemaker work might function more effectively in our congregation to overcome terrorism and war? These are the two questions I bring to [the famous] words from Matthew 5. 9-15. You are invited to ask your own questions from your situation remembering that our answers have everything to do with the future of our children, our youth and students, our family life and retired people. Also on Ekklesia this morning: Questions asked about intelligence that preceded Christian peacemaker's release.
[Pic: Gene Stoltzfus. His CPT biographical note is here. And he has a weblog called, appropriately enough, Peace Talk.]

[00.01 GMT] Nonviolent release for Christian peacemakers (Ekklesia, UK); Christian Peacemakers Team To Stay In Iraq (newswire.co.nz, New Zealand); Christian Peacemakers celebrate release (Christian Science Monitor, USA); Gandhian activists freed in Iraq (Deccan Herald, India); ‘It is essential we voice our concern’ (Whitehorse Star, Canada); God Forgive America (Collective Bellaciao, France); Sault Ste. Marie Relieved for Loney Family (LTVNEWS.COM, Canada); Two minutes to freedom in SAS-led raid (Times Online, UK).

[18.45 GMT] Ekklesia press briefing on the released Christian Peacemaker Teams activists. By Jonathan Bartley. Norman Kember’s release welcomed by British Muslims (The Muslim News, UK); Loneys ready for reunion (CBC British Columbia [Audio], Canada); Abduction: Scourge of Iraqi unrest (BBC News, UK); Family plans to leave for Iraq today after captive peace workers freed (Radio New Zealand, New Zealand); So Canadian troops are in Iraq (Vive Le Canada, Canada); Western peace activists freed in Iraq (al-Jazeera.net); Your view: brave or foolhardy? (Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom).

[18.15 GMT] Freed hostages in Iraq for group with Christian conviction in active pacifism (Brooks Bulletin, Canada). A willingness to accept risk has always been part of an organization whose genesis can be traced to a "good old farmboy" from Canada who believed it was a cop-out simply to turn the other cheek. "People think that war is successful even if tens of millions of people get killed in the process," Ron Sider, the theologian credited with inspiring Christian Peacemaker[Teams], said in an interview." If some non-violent peacemakers are put to death by vicious people, that does not mean that non-violence has failed - it means that we live in a vicious world and lots of people do very evil things." It was at a Mennonite world conference in France two decades ago that Sider, who grew up in rural southern Ontario as the child of a Brethren in Christ pastor, challenged Christian pacifists to become more [assertive]. "Unless we are ready to die developing new non-violent attempts to reduce conflict, we should confess that we never really meant that the cross was an alternative to the sword," Sider told the conference in 1984.Now a theology professor at Palmer Theological Seminary at Eastern University in Philadelphia, Sider says Mennonites had to show they had a real alternative to war. "That would mean putting ourselves on the line and putting ourselves between warring parties," he told The Canadian Press. [Pic: Ron Sider] The Sider Centre.

[15.30 GMT] 'Right to go' Peace campaigner Bruce Kent supports Norman Kember's decision to go to Iraq; Hostage release 'is bitter-sweet' ; Full text: Straw statement ; In quotes: Delight and relief (all BBC News, UK). Christian Peacemakers delighted (Montreal Gazette, Canada). Norman Kember [pic] has issued a brief statement from the British Embassy in Iraq, saying that he is safe, grateful to be free, and looking forward to being reunited with family and friends in the UK. Meanwhile, at simultaneous press conferences in Canada and the US, Christian Peacemaker Teams have called for an end to the military occupation of Iraq. In London, Tim Nafziger of CPT (who is also an associate of the Anabaptist Network and Ekklesia), has said: "Some of the grief and pain we have been through is something that is a daily thing for Iraqis. So many lives have been lost and they don't necessarily make the national news."

[14.45 GMT] Listen again to the CPT release news story on BBC Radio 4 - interviews with Peggy Gish of Christian Peacemaker Teams, Canon Andrew White and the Rev Rob Frost. Plus an excerpt from Norman Kember's Premier Radio talk before he went to Iraq. (Related news stories and links below). Latest TV report (BBC). How Iraq hostages were freed (BBC); Hostage Kember is freed in SAS raid (Mirror.co.uk, UK); Canadian hostages freed in covert raid in Iraq (Globe and Mail, Canada); Blast hits Iraq anti-terror unit (BBC News, UK). Christian peace group calls for end to Iraq occupation (Ireland Online, Ireland); Christian peacemakers delighted at release and Hostages in good condition (Edmonton Journal, Canada) - just in from the CPT press conference in Toronto this afternoon. Also from Ireland Online today: 13:45:54 - 'No shots fired' in hostage freeing 13:14:25 - At least 35 Iraqis killed in bomb attacks 11:33:05 - Army dog-handler jailed for Abu Ghraib abuse 10:05:40 - Attacks in Iraqi capital kill at least 19 09:48:32 - British and Canadian hostages freed in Iraq 08:16:02 - Roadside bombs kill five in central Iraq 07:43:00 - Thousands of Shiites march to Baghdad shrine

[14.10 GMT] Christians defend Iraq nonviolence tactics against critics (Ekklesia, UK) - Christian Peacemaker Teams spokesperson Peggy Gish, who also writes for Ekklesia, told the BBC World At One Programme: “All of us on the Iraq team have taken a great risk – but we still look back on our work as very important.” She continued: “I don’t think we have been irresponsible. There are people being killed and tortured in Iraq …on a daily basis. We are reporting human rights abuses, and we believe that when governments and agencies are watching and acting [on these], this reduces the amount of violence going on.” Concluded Ms Gish: “We are all very excited and deeply grateful that [our friends] have been restored to us. But we continue to mourn the loss of Tom Fox.” She said that it was unfair to say that the CPTers had put the lives of others at risk, since the Team has repeatedly said that it does not want violence used to release its captives. That was also a pledge made by Norman Kember, Jim Loney, Harmeet Sooden and Tom Fox. Christian Peacemaker Teams has welcomed the fact that no-one was killed or injured in the multilateral operation which freed the hostages. Additional: Peggy Gish at Voices in the Wilderness; Iraq - A Journey of Hope and Peace, by Peggy Gish (Herald Press, 2004 - pic is of cover); Indymedia UK - Eyewitness Iraq; CPTnet July Releases: IRAQ: Letter from Peggy Gish; Peggy Gish on Ekklesia and related sites.

[14.00 GMT] Joyful day' as military forces free Canadian and British hostages (940 News, Canada); Bombings Kill Another 35 People In Iraq (WRAL.com, NC, USA); Christian Peacemakers delighted (National Post, USA); Man With A Mission (Toronto Pulse 24, Canada); Prayers offered at vigil to end war in Iraq (Daily Miner and News); Christian Peacemaker Teams respond to Loney release (SooToday.com); Killing of Christian Peacemaker in Iraq mourned (Pittsburgh Post Gazette, PA, USA); Who killed Tom Fox? Why and what's the reason for it? (Huffington Post, NY, USA).

[14.00 GMT] Joyful day' as military forces free Canadian and British hostages (940 News, Canada); Bombings Kill Another 35 People In Iraq (WRAL.com, NC, USA); Christian Peacemakers delighted (National Post, USA); Man With A Mission (Toronto Pulse 24, Canada); Prayers offered at vigil to end war in Iraq (Daily Miner and News); Christian Peacemaker Teams respond to Loney release (SooToday.com).

[12.45 GMT] Iraq three years later: A glance back -- from the 19th century until today. By Laurie King-Irani, (Electronic Iraq); Iraq Militants Release Christian Peacemakers (BosNewsLife, Hungary). Christian Peacemaker Teams will be interviewed today at 13.00 GMT on the BBC World at One Programme. (Broadcast weekdays from 1.00 - 1.30pm, The World at One is widely regarded as Britain's leading political radio programme. "Lead story: British peace activist Norman Kember and two Canadians are freed four months after being taken hostage in Iraq, after an operation by multinational troops."